E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Richard Dawkins (November 3, 2013): Lord Melvyn Bragg and Thomas Paine
2013-November-03 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Ditch Randi and move over to our fellow atheist Arthur Findlay, then working together we can blow the great religious hoax on the human race clean out of the water."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Sam Nicholls (December 10, 2002): James Randi
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Randi] and his supporters are always given total freedom on all media and educational outlets in the UK to attack arguably two of the greatest scientists that Great Britain has ever produced: The President of the Royal Society and holder of the Order of Merit, Sir William Crookes, and the inventor of radio, Sir Oliver Lodge FRS. No scientist, however well qualified, is allowed on media and educational outlets to balance these attacks."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (August 26, 2002): Professional Wreckers
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The time has come for people to realise that it's a scientific fact that we all survive the death of our physical bodies and it's nothing to do with believing in priestcraft."Read More...
Open Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 11, 2002): Linking Survival with Subatomic Physics
2002-December-11 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"There can be no excuse for refusing to look at experiments."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (August 25, 2002): Professional Wreckers
2002-August-25 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Dr John] Beloff is the perfect ally for James Randi and all the rest of the professional wreckers who are fighting with all their might to block the secular scientific case for survival from reaching the public."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to John Samson (September 16, 2002): Society for Psychical Research
2002-September-16 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This crushing proof of survival after death was not only censored by those who control what sees the light of day within the one-god religion of Spiritualism. It has also been censored by the thought police who have infiltrated the Society for Psychical Research ever since I first submitted these reports in 1983."Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 1, 2002): Scientific Proof and the Media
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Whenever a scientist makes a public stand and links so-called paranormal phenomena with quantum mechanics, that is, hints that there may be a rational scientific explanation to account for any aspect of the "paranormal", it's as if a button is pushed on media computers and a list of names pop up of "experts" who will immediately be wheeled on to rubbish any scientist who dares to support Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge, the pioneers of radio, television and subatomic physics."Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Peter Wadhams (May 24, 2002): An Experiment Proving Survival After Death
2002-May-24 Filed in: Mediums
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Only repeatable experiments with a materialisation medium can give the crushing proof that we all survive the death of our physical bodies.Read More...
(...)
Our ancestors witnessed the same phenomena and jumped to the wrong conclusions. Hence all the dangerous and divisive religions that are tearing the world apart. All the religious killing with stop immediately people find out they are fighting over nothing whatsoever apart from ancient people misunderstanding natural forces in nature."
Letter from Michael Roll to The Royal Society (April 26, 2002): Philosophical Balance
2002-April-26 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"I see that Professor Bernard Carr, the President of the SPR, has been booked to speak at The Royal Society on 9th May. May those of us who have started from the base that Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge were correct in their conclusions be permitted to balance the thoughts of Prof. Carr and the hierarchy of the SPR?"Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (July 2, 2001): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death
2001-July-02 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Uncomfortable discoveries in physics that prove we all survive the death of our physical bodies are being deliberately blocked from even coming to the attention of people in Great Britain for them to accept or reject as the case may be. This is solely to keep the old-boy network ticking over nicely."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Gary Schwartz (May 1, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth
2003-May-01 Filed in: Mediums
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This begs the question, why has Prof. Archie Roy kept quiet about the revolutionary mediumship of Rita Goold that he witnessed in 1983?"Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor B D Josephson (February 24, 2003): "Psi Supporters"
2003-February-24 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I hope you are right and the "psi supporters" at Edinburgh University now pluck up the courage to come out in the open and back Parnia and Fenwick."Read More...
Letter from Thomas Jones to Ray Taylor (February 11, 2002): SPR Member Responds to Prof. Fontana
2002-February-11 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Tom Jones writes:
"It is understandable then that Mr. Roll makes the remark that any connection between survival and physics "threatens the authority" of psychologists, and I am at a loss to understand why the professor labels this claim as "absurd". Perhaps it is due to Mr. Roll's unfortunate use of terms; he should have said, the connection between subatomic physics and survival, if real, contradicts the current paradigms upon which psychology is based, and the evidence in proof of a separate mind and brain shows the inadequacy of psychology as a true and convincing science regarding consciousness and its survival of death."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to an Inquirer (February 6, 2002): Secular Case for Survival
2002-February-06 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This now explains why our ancestors made the terrible mistake of inventing all the dangerous and divisive religions. They witnessed the same thing that I did and jumped to the wrong conclusions. They thought the people who live in the invisible part of the universe were angels, devils, gods or worst of all, Big Daddy God himself! Sadly, most of them are just as thick and stupid as when they were on Earth."Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Ray Taylor (February 5, 2002): Censorship in the SPR
2002-February-05 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"In spite of what Professor David Fontana says, those who control the Society for Psychical Research censor vital information that is upsetting to the powerful religious and scientific establishments. It's called peer-refereeing but it still boils down to censorship."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Barry Eaton (April 18, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In order to protect the jobs and reputations of professional "experts", organisations and Trust funds that have been set up specifically to look into life after death and related subjects have been infiltrated and destroyed from within. Huge amounts of money have been deliberately funnelled towards "experts" who can be relied upon to make sure the public never have access to the published work of scientists who started from the base of linking survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Sam Nicholls (February 27, 2004): James "The Amazing" Randi
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"No qualified scientists are allowed on British television to put the secular scientific case for survival after death. There are far too many powerful "experts" with too much to lose when people eventually have access to the scientific case for a separate mind and brain."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (May 1, 2002): The Vatican Takes Its Own Scientific Path
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"They date everything from 1543, Copernicus, the Roman Catholic priest who said the Earth goes round the Sun. They are of course very careful not to let the public know that Copernicus came across the work of the great Greek scientist Aristarchus 280 BC! The Vatican has now embraced Darwin hook, line and sinker. However, again they are very careful not to mention Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-author of the Theory of Evolution. He has been written out of our Christian history books because he put forward the secular case for survival after death as a branch of physics - that we are dealing with natural forces in the universe.Read More...
All the time orthodox scientists have gone down the wrong path - the Big Bang and Einstein's Theory of Relativity they are no danger whatsoever to the power of the priests. It makes the priests the only alternative, they keep the mystery going and their lucrative monopoly on the vast life after death industry."
Letter from Michael Roll to Ian Hislop (December 16, 2001): Corruption in the Scientific Community
2001-December-16 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Almost single-handedly this "expert" is holding up the pillar of orthodox scientific teaching throughout the world - that the mind and brain are the same and that death is the end of everything."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to David Duffield (January 6, 2003): Philosophical Balance
2003-January-06 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am appealing to the British sense of fair play. Every time you hear James Randi and his devoted followers, who still have total control of all media and educational outlets, attack our great scientist Sir William Crookes. Please say, all right, we have heard your case that Crookes was a liar, a fraud, a crank, a gullible Spiritualist, and a sex maniac. May we now please hear from qualified scientists who disagree with everything you say about this former President of the Royal Society?"Read More...